Skeleton argument Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Skeleton argument - Case Study Example6. The Law Commission and The Scots Law Commission established that in consumer condenses there are terms included that are non personally negotiated2. The role of UCTA is to determine if the terms used are fair or unfair. In this accompaniment case Ms Edwards was not involved in any kind of negotiations on term (a) and (b) of the moving in agreement.7. The Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 mentions that it is necessary for the terms in a contract to satisfy the specification of reasonableness3. This would permit a term to be fair and dependent. The terms in the occupancy contract did not meet these requirements.2. The Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 2 (2) states that in the event of stultification or loss, the individual shall not limit or eliminate the liability unless the term fulfils the necessity of reasonableness4. In this case the term (c) is considered unreasonable.3. In the case of London Borough of Newha v Khatun, Zeb and Iqbal CA 2 4-Feb-2004 held that the terms of a tenancy agreement are controlled by the Unfair Contract Regulations to determine the unfair phrases and prevent them from being enforced5. frugal Ministers The Law Commission and The Scottish Law Commission Justice.gov.uk (February 2005) http//lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/docs/lc292_Unfair_Terms_In_Contracts.pdf Accessed January 1,